<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 870 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a dispute over the entitlement of dealers&#039; discount for assessable value calculation. The rejection of the refund claim on grounds of limitation and unjust enrichment was overturned. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s previous order accepting the deduction of dealers&#039; discount under protest was upheld, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate confirming non-passing of duty to dealers. Consequently, the Tribunal granted consequential relief to the appellants, allowing their refund claim of Rs. 26,55,354/-, inclusive of amounts paid under protest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 870 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a dispute over the entitlement of dealers&#039; discount for assessable value calculation. The rejection of the refund claim on grounds of limitation and unjust enrichment was overturned. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s previous order accepting the deduction of dealers&#039; discount under protest was upheld, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate confirming non-passing of duty to dealers. Consequently, the Tribunal granted consequential relief to the appellants, allowing their refund claim of Rs. 26,55,354/-, inclusive of amounts paid under protest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>