<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 869 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127934</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over remission of duty and Education Cess due to the destruction of inputs in a fire accident during a job work procedure. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the manufacturing process was incomplete as no new products emerged after the inputs were issued. The Tribunal considered a previous decision in a similar case as binding precedent and overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 869 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127934</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over remission of duty and Education Cess due to the destruction of inputs in a fire accident during a job work procedure. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the manufacturing process was incomplete as no new products emerged after the inputs were issued. The Tribunal considered a previous decision in a similar case as binding precedent and overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>