<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (1) TMI 20 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127928</link>
    <description>The power under clause (vii) of section 5 of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, was confined to fixing a single taxable point in the series of sales and did not authorise the Government to shift the charge to a purchase point or alter liability beyond the Act and rules. Rule 4 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950 treated sale price as the basis of turnover, and the challenged notification fixing the last purchase as the taxable point exceeded that statutory scheme. The absence of a valid rule under section 24 and defects in prior publication reinforced the invalidity of the arrangement. The notification was ultra vires and the levy on purchase turnover was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (1) TMI 20 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127928</link>
      <description>The power under clause (vii) of section 5 of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, was confined to fixing a single taxable point in the series of sales and did not authorise the Government to shift the charge to a purchase point or alter liability beyond the Act and rules. Rule 4 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950 treated sale price as the basis of turnover, and the challenged notification fixing the last purchase as the taxable point exceeded that statutory scheme. The absence of a valid rule under section 24 and defects in prior publication reinforced the invalidity of the arrangement. The notification was ultra vires and the levy on purchase turnover was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>