<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (1) TMI 17 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127912</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for challenging the assessment orders and seeking relief under the Indian Contract Act. The court emphasized the availability of remedies in both jurisdictions for improper assessment, which the petitioner did not utilize, leading to the denial of any remedy in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (1) TMI 17 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127912</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for challenging the assessment orders and seeking relief under the Indian Contract Act. The court emphasized the availability of remedies in both jurisdictions for improper assessment, which the petitioner did not utilize, leading to the denial of any remedy in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>