https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127876 A writ petition under Article 226 was held inappropriate where the core dispute depended on disputed questions of fact, including the claim that relevant sales took place outside the State. The Court noted that such factual controversy could not be resolved satisfactorily in writ proceedings, which do not ordinarily involve evidence, especially when the statute provided an ordinary machinery for factual determination and assessment. Because the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 supplied tribunals for deciding those facts and allowed legal questions to reach the High Court, the petitioners were required to use that statutory remedy. The writ petition was therefore dismissed. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127876 A writ petition under Article 226 was held inappropriate where the core dispute depended on disputed questions of fact, including the claim that relevant sales took place outside the State. The Court noted that such factual controversy could not be resolved satisfactorily in writ proceedings, which do not ordinarily involve evidence, especially when the statute provided an ordinary machinery for factual determination and assessment. Because the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 supplied tribunals for deciding those facts and allowed legal questions to reach the High Court, the petitioners were required to use that statutory remedy. The writ petition was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 05 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127876