<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (11) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127851</link>
    <description>An Andhra Pradesh Legislature competent over transferred territories may amend and extend an existing law that continued in force there under the saving provisions of the Andhra State Act and the States Reorganisation Act. The Constitution does not require reenactment in full, and legislation by incorporation or reference is permissible. On that basis, the adaptation and extension of the Madras Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1939 was treated as a valid exercise of legislative power and not an impermissible abdication or violation of Article 246(3). The challenge to the taxing statute therefore failed, and the levy provisions were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (11) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127851</link>
      <description>An Andhra Pradesh Legislature competent over transferred territories may amend and extend an existing law that continued in force there under the saving provisions of the Andhra State Act and the States Reorganisation Act. The Constitution does not require reenactment in full, and legislation by incorporation or reference is permissible. On that basis, the adaptation and extension of the Madras Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1939 was treated as a valid exercise of legislative power and not an impermissible abdication or violation of Article 246(3). The challenge to the taxing statute therefore failed, and the levy provisions were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>