https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127848 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable against a sales tax reassessment order where the statute provided an effective appellate remedy. The challenge concerned the interpretation and application of the reassessment power under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, not the validity of the statute itself, and the existence of a question of law did not justify bypassing the appellate hierarchy. The Court also treated the need to deposit tax pending appeal as insufficient to render the remedy inadequate. No true jurisdictional defect was shown, so the petition was rejected. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:09:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127848 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable against a sales tax reassessment order where the statute provided an effective appellate remedy. The challenge concerned the interpretation and application of the reassessment power under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, not the validity of the statute itself, and the existence of a question of law did not justify bypassing the appellate hierarchy. The Court also treated the need to deposit tax pending appeal as insufficient to render the remedy inadequate. No true jurisdictional defect was shown, so the petition was rejected. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 13 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127848