<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 919 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127820</link>
    <description>A special statutory regime for sugarcane, sugar and molasses was treated as occupying the field of procurement, price, movement and sale, so the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act did not apply to sugar mills&#039; transactions in those commodities and the related market fee was unsustainable. By contrast, wheat products, vegetable oils and rice transactions remained within the Market Act because the statutory definition and Schedule covered them and no overriding regime displaced the Act, subject to the clarification that rice mills could not be compelled to shift their premises to the market yard. Milk-based infant food was not treated as agricultural produce, while packed blended tea sold in market areas remained subject to the Act and the fee levy was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 919 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127820</link>
      <description>A special statutory regime for sugarcane, sugar and molasses was treated as occupying the field of procurement, price, movement and sale, so the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act did not apply to sugar mills&#039; transactions in those commodities and the related market fee was unsustainable. By contrast, wheat products, vegetable oils and rice transactions remained within the Market Act because the statutory definition and Schedule covered them and no overriding regime displaced the Act, subject to the clarification that rice mills could not be compelled to shift their premises to the market yard. Milk-based infant food was not treated as agricultural produce, while packed blended tea sold in market areas remained subject to the Act and the fee levy was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>