<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (4) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127799</link>
    <description>On transfer of a business, Rule 21-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules made both the transferor and transferee liable for sales tax dues arising from the transferred business. The recovery mechanism was applied to prevent evasion of revenue by shifting liability between them. On the facts, the Madras HC directed that recovery proceedings by distress warrant should begin against the transferor first, and recourse against the transferee should be taken only if the amount could not be realised from the transferor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:00:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (4) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127799</link>
      <description>On transfer of a business, Rule 21-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules made both the transferor and transferee liable for sales tax dues arising from the transferred business. The recovery mechanism was applied to prevent evasion of revenue by shifting liability between them. On the facts, the Madras HC directed that recovery proceedings by distress warrant should begin against the transferor first, and recourse against the transferee should be taken only if the amount could not be realised from the transferor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>