<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (8) TMI 35 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127774</link>
    <description>Goods present in Orissa when the contract of sale was made could be treated as a local sale under the Orissa Sales Tax Act&#039;s deeming provision, even though the ores were to be extracted later and delivered for export through Calcutta. The Court reasoned that the contract concerned ores situated in the taxing State at the relevant time, so sales tax was validly attracted and the later mode of delivery did not defeat the levy. Applying pith and substance, it further found the tax law to be a sales measure within the State field, with only incidental overlap on export-related Central subjects. The assessment was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (8) TMI 35 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127774</link>
      <description>Goods present in Orissa when the contract of sale was made could be treated as a local sale under the Orissa Sales Tax Act&#039;s deeming provision, even though the ores were to be extracted later and delivered for export through Calcutta. The Court reasoned that the contract concerned ores situated in the taxing State at the relevant time, so sales tax was validly attracted and the later mode of delivery did not defeat the levy. Applying pith and substance, it further found the tax law to be a sales measure within the State field, with only incidental overlap on export-related Central subjects. The assessment was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>