<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (2) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127734</link>
    <description>The phrase &quot;three calendar years&quot; in section 11(5) of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was given its ordinary meaning of a year running from 1 January to 31 December, not a 36-month period from expiry of the assessment year; on that basis, the notice and assessment proceedings were within time. The retrospective amendment could validate the assessment by removing the limitation bar in fiscal matters, but it did not sustain a penalty where the proviso to the amending Act barred penalties that could not lawfully have been imposed when proceedings began. The assessment survived, while the penalty was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (2) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127734</link>
      <description>The phrase &quot;three calendar years&quot; in section 11(5) of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was given its ordinary meaning of a year running from 1 January to 31 December, not a 36-month period from expiry of the assessment year; on that basis, the notice and assessment proceedings were within time. The retrospective amendment could validate the assessment by removing the limitation bar in fiscal matters, but it did not sustain a penalty where the proviso to the amending Act barred penalties that could not lawfully have been imposed when proceedings began. The assessment survived, while the penalty was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>