<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 83 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127716</link>
    <description>A foreign matrimonial decree is recognised in India only if the foreign court had jurisdiction under Indian private international law; domicile or bona fide residence is a jurisdictional fact, and a recital of jurisdiction is not conclusive if disproved by evidence. A decree obtained by fraud going to jurisdiction is not binding in India under section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On the facts, the husband had only simulated residence and domicile in Nevada to obtain the divorce, so the decree was procured without jurisdiction and by misrepresentation. The foreign divorce was therefore not recognised in India and did not bar the wife&#039;s maintenance claim under section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 83 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127716</link>
      <description>A foreign matrimonial decree is recognised in India only if the foreign court had jurisdiction under Indian private international law; domicile or bona fide residence is a jurisdictional fact, and a recital of jurisdiction is not conclusive if disproved by evidence. A decree obtained by fraud going to jurisdiction is not binding in India under section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On the facts, the husband had only simulated residence and domicile in Nevada to obtain the divorce, so the decree was procured without jurisdiction and by misrepresentation. The foreign divorce was therefore not recognised in India and did not bar the wife&#039;s maintenance claim under section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>