<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (12) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127711</link>
    <description>Limitation under section 11-A of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 did not govern a registered dealer&#039;s first assessment, because that provision applied only to reassessment or additional assessment after a final assessment and escaped turnover. Section 11(5) also did not apply, as it was confined to an unregistered dealer&#039;s wilful failure to register. For a pending original assessment under section 11(1) to section 11(4), including best judgment assessment on default of return, there was no final assessment or statutory escaped turnover. The three-year limit in section 11-A could not be imported into the original assessment process, so the limitation challenge failed and the department could proceed under section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (12) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127711</link>
      <description>Limitation under section 11-A of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 did not govern a registered dealer&#039;s first assessment, because that provision applied only to reassessment or additional assessment after a final assessment and escaped turnover. Section 11(5) also did not apply, as it was confined to an unregistered dealer&#039;s wilful failure to register. For a pending original assessment under section 11(1) to section 11(4), including best judgment assessment on default of return, there was no final assessment or statutory escaped turnover. The three-year limit in section 11-A could not be imported into the original assessment process, so the limitation challenge failed and the department could proceed under section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>