https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127700 Section 11(5) applies to a dealer liable to register who failed to apply, while section 11A concerns a different situation. Because section 11(5) contains no express limitation period, notices issued under that provision were not shown to be without jurisdiction merely by invoking section 11A by analogy. The availability of appeal and tribunal review also weighed against writ interference on a disputed limitation question. On that reasoning, the notices were not liable to be struck down in writ proceedings. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:34:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127700 Section 11(5) applies to a dealer liable to register who failed to apply, while section 11A concerns a different situation. Because section 11(5) contains no express limitation period, notices issued under that provision were not shown to be without jurisdiction merely by invoking section 11A by analogy. The availability of appeal and tribunal review also weighed against writ interference on a disputed limitation question. On that reasoning, the notices were not liable to be struck down in writ proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127700