<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (7) TMI 46 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127692</link>
    <description>Section 7(4a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 was upheld as a valid registration-stage security provision because the demand was confined by objective limits: good or sufficient reasons and a requirement of reasonableness. The expression &quot;tax payable&quot; was construed to include tax that would become payable, not only tax already assessed and demanded, so the section was workable at the registration stage. Rule 6 of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 was also upheld, as the inquiry it contemplated was verification-based and not a judicial trial; natural justice was satisfied so long as adverse material could be answered. The substantive challenges therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (7) TMI 46 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127692</link>
      <description>Section 7(4a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 was upheld as a valid registration-stage security provision because the demand was confined by objective limits: good or sufficient reasons and a requirement of reasonableness. The expression &quot;tax payable&quot; was construed to include tax that would become payable, not only tax already assessed and demanded, so the section was workable at the registration stage. Rule 6 of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 was also upheld, as the inquiry it contemplated was verification-based and not a judicial trial; natural justice was satisfied so long as adverse material could be answered. The substantive challenges therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>