<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 42 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127680</link>
    <description>Delegated assessment powers under section 11(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, included the delegate&#039;s authority to form the requisite satisfaction on information in his possession. Section 15 and rule 71 permitted delegation of the Commissioner&#039;s powers to a Commercial Tax Officer, and the condition of satisfaction was treated as integral to the exercise of the delegated power rather than a separate, non-delegable step. The prescribed form and rules also indicated that the issuing authority itself had to be satisfied. On that construction, the Commercial Tax Officer could validly issue the notice, and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 42 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127680</link>
      <description>Delegated assessment powers under section 11(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, included the delegate&#039;s authority to form the requisite satisfaction on information in his possession. Section 15 and rule 71 permitted delegation of the Commissioner&#039;s powers to a Commercial Tax Officer, and the condition of satisfaction was treated as integral to the exercise of the delegated power rather than a separate, non-delegable step. The prescribed form and rules also indicated that the issuing authority itself had to be satisfied. On that construction, the Commercial Tax Officer could validly issue the notice, and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>