https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127667 The Supreme Court upheld the Lok Ayukta's decision to remove the Appellant from service, dismissing the appeal and allowing the State's appeal. The Court found that the Lok Ayukta had the authority to conduct the disciplinary proceedings and impose the punishment, rejecting arguments of natural justice violation and inappropriate punishment. Criticizing the High Court's interference with the punishment, the Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review to the decision-making process, not the decision itself. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127667 The Supreme Court upheld the Lok Ayukta's decision to remove the Appellant from service, dismissing the appeal and allowing the State's appeal. The Court found that the Lok Ayukta had the authority to conduct the disciplinary proceedings and impose the punishment, rejecting arguments of natural justice violation and inappropriate punishment. Criticizing the High Court's interference with the punishment, the Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review to the decision-making process, not the decision itself. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127667