<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (11) TMI 22 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127637</link>
    <description>Composite building contracts may be split for sales tax purposes so that the materials component is treated as a taxable sale of goods under Entry 54 and the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, while the contractor remains a dealer when goods are supplied for remuneration in the course of business. The timing of tax depends on when the sale occurs, so a contract made before commencement is not exempt if the taxable sale arises after commencement. However, a valuation scheme based on an artificial deduction formula and estimated labour content was held to exceed legislative power because tax under Entry 54 must be linked to the actual sale price of goods. The impugned valuation provisions were severed as ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (11) TMI 22 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127637</link>
      <description>Composite building contracts may be split for sales tax purposes so that the materials component is treated as a taxable sale of goods under Entry 54 and the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, while the contractor remains a dealer when goods are supplied for remuneration in the course of business. The timing of tax depends on when the sale occurs, so a contract made before commencement is not exempt if the taxable sale arises after commencement. However, a valuation scheme based on an artificial deduction formula and estimated labour content was held to exceed legislative power because tax under Entry 54 must be linked to the actual sale price of goods. The impugned valuation provisions were severed as ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>