<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (7) TMI 44 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127635</link>
    <description>An agreement requiring the transferee to pay the full price of machinery in instalments, while the transferor retained title only until full recovery, was treated as a hire-purchase arrangement rather than a mere hire. The court applied the principle that the substance of the contract must be gathered from the agreement as a whole and held that obligations such as maintenance and payment for spares were consistent with ownership in substance. A clause allowing the machinery to be taken back at residual value did not change the essential character of the transaction. The machinery transfer was therefore a sale within section 2(g) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, and taxable as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (7) TMI 44 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127635</link>
      <description>An agreement requiring the transferee to pay the full price of machinery in instalments, while the transferor retained title only until full recovery, was treated as a hire-purchase arrangement rather than a mere hire. The court applied the principle that the substance of the contract must be gathered from the agreement as a whole and held that obligations such as maintenance and payment for spares were consistent with ownership in substance. A clause allowing the machinery to be taken back at residual value did not change the essential character of the transaction. The machinery transfer was therefore a sale within section 2(g) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, and taxable as such.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>