<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (2) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127605</link>
    <description>An assessee could object before the Appellate Tribunal to liability on turnover already assessed, even if that turnover was not disputed in the appeal memorandum. Section 12-A(4) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was read as giving the Tribunal wide rehearing powers to pass such order as it thinks fit on the appeal as a whole, and the form requirements in section 12-A(3) and rule 13-B(a) did not cut down that jurisdiction. The Tribunal could permit amendment of the memorandum of appeal where necessary. The earlier authority only barred introduction of a new item outside the assessed turnover and did not apply to an objection to part of the existing turnover. The Tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to entertain the objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (2) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127605</link>
      <description>An assessee could object before the Appellate Tribunal to liability on turnover already assessed, even if that turnover was not disputed in the appeal memorandum. Section 12-A(4) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was read as giving the Tribunal wide rehearing powers to pass such order as it thinks fit on the appeal as a whole, and the form requirements in section 12-A(3) and rule 13-B(a) did not cut down that jurisdiction. The Tribunal could permit amendment of the memorandum of appeal where necessary. The earlier authority only barred introduction of a new item outside the assessed turnover and did not apply to an objection to part of the existing turnover. The Tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to entertain the objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>