<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 889 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127604</link>
    <description>SC held that it can, in exercise of its powers under Art. 129 read with Art. 142, pass orders necessary to do complete justice, which may include debarring an advocate and suspending licence for a specified period, but subject to self-imposed limits. The Court emphasized Art. 142&#039;s remedial breadth while noting it cannot be used to treat contemners as ordinary litigating parties or to routinely override statutory provisions, except to balance equities and resolve matters before the Court to achieve complete justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 11:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 889 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127604</link>
      <description>SC held that it can, in exercise of its powers under Art. 129 read with Art. 142, pass orders necessary to do complete justice, which may include debarring an advocate and suspending licence for a specified period, but subject to self-imposed limits. The Court emphasized Art. 142&#039;s remedial breadth while noting it cannot be used to treat contemners as ordinary litigating parties or to routinely override statutory provisions, except to balance equities and resolve matters before the Court to achieve complete justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>