https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127587 An application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the three-year period runs from when the dispute arises; on the facts, the right to apply accrued when the State served the demand notice, and the application was therefore time-barred. Where an arbitration agreement names a specific arbitrator, the court must ordinarily refer the dispute to that named arbitrator and cannot ignore the contractual appointment or call for panels of arbitrators unless the named arbitrator refuses or is unable to act. The challenged order was therefore not sustainable. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127587 An application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the three-year period runs from when the dispute arises; on the facts, the right to apply accrued when the State served the demand notice, and the application was therefore time-barred. Where an arbitration agreement names a specific arbitrator, the court must ordinarily refer the dispute to that named arbitrator and cannot ignore the contractual appointment or call for panels of arbitrators unless the named arbitrator refuses or is unable to act. The challenged order was therefore not sustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127587