<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (8) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127582</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was upheld against a constitutional objection that the Bill lacked the Rajpramukh&#039;s prior recommendation, because Presidential assent cured the defect under Article 255 of the Constitution. On exemption, betel leaves were held not to fall within &quot;vegetables&quot; in the Schedule, the term being confined to its ordinary popular meaning and not a botanical one; they also could not be treated as &quot;plants&quot; for imported betel leaves. The taxing entry was construed on its ordinary language, and no real ambiguity justified a broader exemption. The writ petitions were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (8) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127582</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was upheld against a constitutional objection that the Bill lacked the Rajpramukh&#039;s prior recommendation, because Presidential assent cured the defect under Article 255 of the Constitution. On exemption, betel leaves were held not to fall within &quot;vegetables&quot; in the Schedule, the term being confined to its ordinary popular meaning and not a botanical one; they also could not be treated as &quot;plants&quot; for imported betel leaves. The taxing entry was construed on its ordinary language, and no real ambiguity justified a broader exemption. The writ petitions were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>