<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127560</link>
    <description>Single point taxation for hides and skins under the Madras General Sales Tax Act is commodity-based and cannot be defeated by a dealer-specific licence condition. The charging provision in section 3 yields to section 5(vi), which requires tax only at one point in the sales chain; a rule that taxes an unlicensed dealer on each sale, or withdraws the benefit of single point levy unless a licence is taken out, is inconsistent with that statutory scheme and invalid. Section 6-A does not apply unless a prescribed condition under section 5 is contravened or a licence requirement is breached. The practical effect is that an unlicensed dealer is not liable to multi-point taxation merely for lack of licence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127560</link>
      <description>Single point taxation for hides and skins under the Madras General Sales Tax Act is commodity-based and cannot be defeated by a dealer-specific licence condition. The charging provision in section 3 yields to section 5(vi), which requires tax only at one point in the sales chain; a rule that taxes an unlicensed dealer on each sale, or withdraws the benefit of single point levy unless a licence is taken out, is inconsistent with that statutory scheme and invalid. Section 6-A does not apply unless a prescribed condition under section 5 is contravened or a licence requirement is breached. The practical effect is that an unlicensed dealer is not liable to multi-point taxation merely for lack of licence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>