<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (4) TMI 47 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127547</link>
    <description>Exemption under Rule 5(1)(h) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules was available only on a sale of the business as a whole, not on a mere disposal of stock-in-trade and some assets. Where the seller continued to carry on business and retained business assets, the transaction did not satisfy that requirement. On the materials considered by the assessing authorities and the Tribunal, the sale was not of the business as a whole, and the exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (4) TMI 47 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127547</link>
      <description>Exemption under Rule 5(1)(h) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules was available only on a sale of the business as a whole, not on a mere disposal of stock-in-trade and some assets. Where the seller continued to carry on business and retained business assets, the transaction did not satisfy that requirement. On the materials considered by the assessing authorities and the Tribunal, the sale was not of the business as a whole, and the exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>