https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127537 The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution (Eighty Fifth) Amendment Act, 2001, allowing the implementation of Article 16(4A) for promoting reserve category candidates without affecting petitioners. The Court directed promotions based on available vacancies and reservation provisions due to insufficient vacancies for implementation. Individual state enactments' validity would be reviewed separately. The matters were transferred to the High Court of Karnataka for expedited consideration, with interim orders remaining valid for four weeks for petitioners to seek relief. All matters were disposed of, transferring records to the High Court for further proceedings. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127537 The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution (Eighty Fifth) Amendment Act, 2001, allowing the implementation of Article 16(4A) for promoting reserve category candidates without affecting petitioners. The Court directed promotions based on available vacancies and reservation provisions due to insufficient vacancies for implementation. Individual state enactments' validity would be reviewed separately. The matters were transferred to the High Court of Karnataka for expedited consideration, with interim orders remaining valid for four weeks for petitioners to seek relief. All matters were disposed of, transferring records to the High Court for further proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127537