<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (3) TMI 27 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127522</link>
    <description>Collections described as &quot;russum&quot; cannot be recovered by the State unless the amount was lawfully leviable as tax under the Act and Rules; a provision allowing a registered dealer to collect tax is only enabling and does not itself create a liability to remit unauthorised collections. On the facts, the commission agents bought goods in their own names, assumed direct liability to sellers, took delivery, and resold to undisclosed principals, so their activity amounted to sales by a dealer rather than a pure agency. Tax was therefore attracted on the sales turnover, and the absence of a section 8 licence did not exempt them from liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:05:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (3) TMI 27 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127522</link>
      <description>Collections described as &quot;russum&quot; cannot be recovered by the State unless the amount was lawfully leviable as tax under the Act and Rules; a provision allowing a registered dealer to collect tax is only enabling and does not itself create a liability to remit unauthorised collections. On the facts, the commission agents bought goods in their own names, assumed direct liability to sellers, took delivery, and resold to undisclosed principals, so their activity amounted to sales by a dealer rather than a pure agency. Tax was therefore attracted on the sales turnover, and the absence of a section 8 licence did not exempt them from liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>