<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (3) TMI 23 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127494</link>
    <description>Transactions involving gunny cloth and iron hoops used in baling and pressing palmyra fibre were treated as sales under the Madras General Sales Tax Act because the packing materials were movable goods, remained goods after use, and property in them was transferred to constituents for consideration. A separately stated price was not necessary where the charges included the material cost in one form or another. The wide statutory definition of sale covered transfer of property in goods in the course of business, and the baling activity necessarily involved such transfers. The transactions were therefore liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (3) TMI 23 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127494</link>
      <description>Transactions involving gunny cloth and iron hoops used in baling and pressing palmyra fibre were treated as sales under the Madras General Sales Tax Act because the packing materials were movable goods, remained goods after use, and property in them was transferred to constituents for consideration. A separately stated price was not necessary where the charges included the material cost in one form or another. The wide statutory definition of sale covered transfer of property in goods in the course of business, and the baling activity necessarily involved such transfers. The transactions were therefore liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>