<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (3) TMI 21 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127492</link>
    <description>Handloom-woven nawar tape was held not to fall within &quot;cloth&quot; in section 5(iii) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act because the exemption was limited to the ordinary and popular meaning of cloth as fabric used for garments or coverings, not narrow tape used for matting cots. The assessee therefore did not qualify for exemption on that basis. A later Government notification exempting sales of handloom cotton nawar tape was also held to have no retrospective effect, as it contained no express indication that it applied to earlier assessment years. The exemption claim thus failed on both construction of the statutory term and the non-retrospective operation of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (3) TMI 21 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127492</link>
      <description>Handloom-woven nawar tape was held not to fall within &quot;cloth&quot; in section 5(iii) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act because the exemption was limited to the ordinary and popular meaning of cloth as fabric used for garments or coverings, not narrow tape used for matting cots. The assessee therefore did not qualify for exemption on that basis. A later Government notification exempting sales of handloom cotton nawar tape was also held to have no retrospective effect, as it contained no express indication that it applied to earlier assessment years. The exemption claim thus failed on both construction of the statutory term and the non-retrospective operation of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>