<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (7) TMI 19 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127448</link>
    <description>Sales tax assessment provisions were construed as a single statutory machinery built around monthly returns and final annual assessment. The use of the word &quot;accepted&quot; in the assessment rule did not change the substance of the process, and the absence of a separate provisional assessment for each month did not invalidate the yearly assessment. The rule permitting final assessment after the close of the year was treated as a continuation of the same scheme, not as dependent on prior month-by-month assessments. A construction that would allow an assessee to defeat tax liability by default was rejected, and the yearly assessment was held valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (7) TMI 19 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127448</link>
      <description>Sales tax assessment provisions were construed as a single statutory machinery built around monthly returns and final annual assessment. The use of the word &quot;accepted&quot; in the assessment rule did not change the substance of the process, and the absence of a separate provisional assessment for each month did not invalidate the yearly assessment. The rule permitting final assessment after the close of the year was treated as a continuation of the same scheme, not as dependent on prior month-by-month assessments. A construction that would allow an assessee to defeat tax liability by default was rejected, and the yearly assessment was held valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>