<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (11) TMI 9 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127419</link>
    <description>Sales tax under the Act attached only where the seller was carrying on the business of selling the goods in question; casual sales of second-hand goods forming private property and unconnected with the dealer&#039;s trading business were outside the charging scheme. The expression &quot;glass-ware&quot; in the Schedule was given its ordinary meaning because no restricted sense was indicated, and plain glass sheets used for window and door panes were held to fall within that entry. A preliminary objection that the reference had to be made by a Bench of two Members was rejected because the matter concerned only whether a reference should be made and did not directly affect revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (11) TMI 9 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127419</link>
      <description>Sales tax under the Act attached only where the seller was carrying on the business of selling the goods in question; casual sales of second-hand goods forming private property and unconnected with the dealer&#039;s trading business were outside the charging scheme. The expression &quot;glass-ware&quot; in the Schedule was given its ordinary meaning because no restricted sense was indicated, and plain glass sheets used for window and door panes were held to fall within that entry. A preliminary objection that the reference had to be made by a Bench of two Members was rejected because the matter concerned only whether a reference should be made and did not directly affect revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>