<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (11) TMI 38 - TRAVANCORE AND COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127407</link>
    <description>The sales tax deduction for cocoanuts and copra used in producing oil and cake was confined to the concessionary scheme for taxable sales within the State and was aimed at avoiding double taxation where purchase tax on copra and sales tax on oil could both arise. Outside-State sales of oil did not qualify for the deduction because no sales tax liability arose on that turnover under the Act. The challenge under Articles 286, 301 and 303(1) also failed, as the provisions were held not to impose a direct and immediate restraint on trade; any impact on inter-State commerce was only indirect or consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (11) TMI 38 - TRAVANCORE AND COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127407</link>
      <description>The sales tax deduction for cocoanuts and copra used in producing oil and cake was confined to the concessionary scheme for taxable sales within the State and was aimed at avoiding double taxation where purchase tax on copra and sales tax on oil could both arise. Outside-State sales of oil did not qualify for the deduction because no sales tax liability arose on that turnover under the Act. The challenge under Articles 286, 301 and 303(1) also failed, as the provisions were held not to impose a direct and immediate restraint on trade; any impact on inter-State commerce was only indirect or consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>