<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (3) TMI 24 - WEST BENGAL HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127401</link>
    <description>A financier who merely advanced the unpaid balance of the purchase price of motor cars and took the vehicles as security was not carrying on a sale or hire-purchase transaction under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The actual sale was made by the manufacturer to the purchasers, while the financier occupied the position of a mortgagee and the purchasers retained the equity of redemption. Because the statutory definition of &quot;sale&quot; excluded mortgage, hypothecation, charge and pledge, the financing arrangement could not be treated as a taxable sale, and the financier was not liable to sales tax as a dealer on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (3) TMI 24 - WEST BENGAL HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127401</link>
      <description>A financier who merely advanced the unpaid balance of the purchase price of motor cars and took the vehicles as security was not carrying on a sale or hire-purchase transaction under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The actual sale was made by the manufacturer to the purchasers, while the financier occupied the position of a mortgagee and the purchasers retained the equity of redemption. Because the statutory definition of &quot;sale&quot; excluded mortgage, hypothecation, charge and pledge, the financing arrangement could not be treated as a taxable sale, and the financier was not liable to sales tax as a dealer on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>