<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (3) TMI 20 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127390</link>
    <description>Under section 12-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s power to pass such order &quot;thereon&quot; as it thinks fit was read with the Act&#039;s scheme and the proviso contemplating refund or additional tax on recomputation. On that basis, the Tribunal was not limited to allowing or rejecting individual grounds in isolation. It could determine the correct legal basis of assessment and remand the matter for fresh computation by the assessing authority, even where the recomputation might increase tax liability. The remand jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the assessment was left to be recomputed in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (3) TMI 20 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127390</link>
      <description>Under section 12-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s power to pass such order &quot;thereon&quot; as it thinks fit was read with the Act&#039;s scheme and the proviso contemplating refund or additional tax on recomputation. On that basis, the Tribunal was not limited to allowing or rejecting individual grounds in isolation. It could determine the correct legal basis of assessment and remand the matter for fresh computation by the assessing authority, even where the recomputation might increase tax liability. The remand jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the assessment was left to be recomputed in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>