<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (3) TMI 52 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127324</link>
    <description>A fiscal exemption for all cereals and all forms of rice was held to cover chira and muri because simple processing did not destroy their essential character as rice or foodgrains. The exemption clause was construed strictly, but any real ambiguity was resolved in favour of the taxpayer, and the assessee therefore obtained sales tax exemption under Item 1 of Schedule 3. The existence of statutory appellate or revisional remedies did not absolutely bar writ relief, and Article 226 remained available where the ordinary remedy had become ineffective without the assessee&#039;s fault. On that basis, the impugned assessment orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (3) TMI 52 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127324</link>
      <description>A fiscal exemption for all cereals and all forms of rice was held to cover chira and muri because simple processing did not destroy their essential character as rice or foodgrains. The exemption clause was construed strictly, but any real ambiguity was resolved in favour of the taxpayer, and the assessee therefore obtained sales tax exemption under Item 1 of Schedule 3. The existence of statutory appellate or revisional remedies did not absolutely bar writ relief, and Article 226 remained available where the ordinary remedy had become ineffective without the assessee&#039;s fault. On that basis, the impugned assessment orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>