https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127296 The document addresses whether a Supplementary Covenant validly amended the Original Covenant so as to preserve the Rajpramukh's ordinance-making power, and whether a Sales Tax Ordinance remained valid after the Constitution of India came into force in the State. It states that the covenanting rulers had not exhausted their power to alter, amend, or abrogate the Covenant, so the Supplementary Covenant was treated as a valid amendment under binding precedent. It further notes that the Ordinance continued in force until the Constitution commenced in the State and thereafter operated as an existing law under Article 372. The challenge to both instruments failed. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:55:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127296 The document addresses whether a Supplementary Covenant validly amended the Original Covenant so as to preserve the Rajpramukh's ordinance-making power, and whether a Sales Tax Ordinance remained valid after the Constitution of India came into force in the State. It states that the covenanting rulers had not exhausted their power to alter, amend, or abrogate the Covenant, so the Supplementary Covenant was treated as a valid amendment under binding precedent. It further notes that the Ordinance continued in force until the Constitution commenced in the State and thereafter operated as an existing law under Article 372. The challenge to both instruments failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 27 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127296