<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127292</link>
    <description>A suit to recover sales tax allegedly collected without authority was held to fall under Article 62 of the Limitation Act, which provides a three-year period for restitutionary claims. Section 18 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was treated as confined to claims for compensation or damages arising from tortious or criminal acts of Government officers, and not to recovery of tax collected without legal basis. Article 16 was also found inapplicable because the demand was not one made as arrears of revenue in the manner contemplated by that provision. The limitation plea therefore failed, and the suit was directed to proceed on the remaining issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127292</link>
      <description>A suit to recover sales tax allegedly collected without authority was held to fall under Article 62 of the Limitation Act, which provides a three-year period for restitutionary claims. Section 18 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was treated as confined to claims for compensation or damages arising from tortious or criminal acts of Government officers, and not to recovery of tax collected without legal basis. Article 16 was also found inapplicable because the demand was not one made as arrears of revenue in the manner contemplated by that provision. The limitation plea therefore failed, and the suit was directed to proceed on the remaining issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>