<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (1) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127278</link>
    <description>Sale proceeds from groundnuts decorticated on behalf of dealers do not form the decorticator&#039;s taxable turnover where the decorticator neither purchases the goods nor sells them as owner, but recovers advances, interest and processing charges and remits the balance to the dealers. As tax on such groundnuts applies at the purchase point rather than sale, those proceeds remain excluded from the decorticator&#039;s turnover. A procedural amendment conferring power to condone delayed or omitted monthly returns applies to pending assessments, because no vested revenue right to refuse the related deduction arises solely from late filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (1) TMI 13 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127278</link>
      <description>Sale proceeds from groundnuts decorticated on behalf of dealers do not form the decorticator&#039;s taxable turnover where the decorticator neither purchases the goods nor sells them as owner, but recovers advances, interest and processing charges and remits the balance to the dealers. As tax on such groundnuts applies at the purchase point rather than sale, those proceeds remain excluded from the decorticator&#039;s turnover. A procedural amendment conferring power to condone delayed or omitted monthly returns applies to pending assessments, because no vested revenue right to refuse the related deduction arises solely from late filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>