<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (2) TMI 9 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127277</link>
    <description>Section 16A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act barred a criminal court from examining the validity of the assessment or the assessee&#039;s tax liability, but this restriction was treated as unconstitutional where the accused challenged the levy itself on constitutional grounds and on the basis that the assessment was outside the Act. The provision was also found to curtail ordinary rights under the Criminal Procedure Code, including the right of defence and revisional scrutiny by superior criminal courts, and to be inconsistent with equal protection. The result was that Section 16A was held ultra vires and the assessment and liability could be contested in the criminal proceedings, so the convictions and sentences could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (2) TMI 9 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127277</link>
      <description>Section 16A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act barred a criminal court from examining the validity of the assessment or the assessee&#039;s tax liability, but this restriction was treated as unconstitutional where the accused challenged the levy itself on constitutional grounds and on the basis that the assessment was outside the Act. The provision was also found to curtail ordinary rights under the Criminal Procedure Code, including the right of defence and revisional scrutiny by superior criminal courts, and to be inconsistent with equal protection. The result was that Section 16A was held ultra vires and the assessment and liability could be contested in the criminal proceedings, so the convictions and sentences could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>