<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127248</link>
    <description>Persons who merely call for bids and conduct auctions, without custody of the goods or authority to pass title, are brokers rather than commission agents. A broker only brings buyer and seller together, while a commission agent is entrusted with the goods and may transfer ownership so that the activity can amount to dealing in goods under the Madras General Sales Tax Act. On the facts found, the respondents only conducted the fish auction, received a small remuneration for that service, never handled the fish, and had no authority to transfer title. Their activity was therefore brokerage, not dealer activity, and they were not liable to sales tax or prosecution under Section 15(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127248</link>
      <description>Persons who merely call for bids and conduct auctions, without custody of the goods or authority to pass title, are brokers rather than commission agents. A broker only brings buyer and seller together, while a commission agent is entrusted with the goods and may transfer ownership so that the activity can amount to dealing in goods under the Madras General Sales Tax Act. On the facts found, the respondents only conducted the fish auction, received a small remuneration for that service, never handled the fish, and had no authority to transfer title. Their activity was therefore brokerage, not dealer activity, and they were not liable to sales tax or prosecution under Section 15(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>