<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (6) TMI 7 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127224</link>
    <description>A mere offer to compound or avoid prosecution under the Bombay Sales Tax Act is not an appealable order unless it contains a conclusive statutory direction or sanction. The Collector&#039;s letter did not compel any action, did not itself sanction prosecution, and only stated that prosecution would not be pursued if composition amount was paid. It therefore lacked the character of an order under Section 21 and could not be appealed; the appeal was premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (6) TMI 7 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127224</link>
      <description>A mere offer to compound or avoid prosecution under the Bombay Sales Tax Act is not an appealable order unless it contains a conclusive statutory direction or sanction. The Collector&#039;s letter did not compel any action, did not itself sanction prosecution, and only stated that prosecution would not be pursued if composition amount was paid. It therefore lacked the character of an order under Section 21 and could not be appealed; the appeal was premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>