<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (1) TMI 18 - TRAVANCORE AND COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127223</link>
    <description>The court found that the transactions were exempt from sales tax under Article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution. Writs of certiorari were issued to annul the sales tax authorities&#039; orders, with refunds and costs awarded to the petitioners. The court affirmed its jurisdiction under Article 226(1) for certiorari despite the availability of revision to the Board of Revenue. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted under Article 132(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:58:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (1) TMI 18 - TRAVANCORE AND COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127223</link>
      <description>The court found that the transactions were exempt from sales tax under Article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution. Writs of certiorari were issued to annul the sales tax authorities&#039; orders, with refunds and costs awarded to the petitioners. The court affirmed its jurisdiction under Article 226(1) for certiorari despite the availability of revision to the Board of Revenue. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted under Article 132(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>