<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (7) TMI 17 - PEPSU HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127220</link>
    <description>An effective statutory appeal against a sales tax assessment was available to assessees served with notice, and that appeal could challenge the legality of the assessment itself, including exemption and non-liability claims. Because the appeal was adequate and no exceptional circumstance justified bypassing it, writ relief under Article 226 could be declined for non-exhaustion of the statutory remedy. Rule 61 also made the payment requirements in the appellate rules applicable to revision petitions, so the Commissioner could insist on payment of the assessed tax, and penalty if any, before entertaining revision. The commentary emphasises exhaustion of statutory remedies and enforcement of procedural preconditions in revision proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (7) TMI 17 - PEPSU HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127220</link>
      <description>An effective statutory appeal against a sales tax assessment was available to assessees served with notice, and that appeal could challenge the legality of the assessment itself, including exemption and non-liability claims. Because the appeal was adequate and no exceptional circumstance justified bypassing it, writ relief under Article 226 could be declined for non-exhaustion of the statutory remedy. Rule 61 also made the payment requirements in the appellate rules applicable to revision petitions, so the Commissioner could insist on payment of the assessed tax, and penalty if any, before entertaining revision. The commentary emphasises exhaustion of statutory remedies and enforcement of procedural preconditions in revision proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>