<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (7) TMI 16 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127208</link>
    <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction was held unavailable where the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 provided a complete statutory remedy by appeal, revision and reference to the High Court. The Court treated the existence of adequate alternative remedies as a sufficient ground to decline examination of the claimed sales tax exemption on merits, and directed the applicants to pursue the remedies under the Act. The applications were therefore not maintainable under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (7) TMI 16 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127208</link>
      <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction was held unavailable where the East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 provided a complete statutory remedy by appeal, revision and reference to the High Court. The Court treated the existence of adequate alternative remedies as a sufficient ground to decline examination of the claimed sales tax exemption on merits, and directed the applicants to pursue the remedies under the Act. The applications were therefore not maintainable under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>