https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127203 A plaint filed in a business name was treated as a misdescription of the existing plaintiff, not a nullity, because procedural rules are meant to advance justice and amendments should ordinarily be allowed where they help determine the real controversy and cause no irremediable prejudice. The correction was therefore permissible. Once the filing was regarded as a correction of description rather than substitution of a new plaintiff or cause, the amendment related back to the original institution of the suit, so limitation did not bar the claim. The technical dismissal was set aside and the matter was remitted for decision on the merits. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127203 A plaint filed in a business name was treated as a misdescription of the existing plaintiff, not a nullity, because procedural rules are meant to advance justice and amendments should ordinarily be allowed where they help determine the real controversy and cause no irremediable prejudice. The correction was therefore permissible. Once the filing was regarded as a correction of description rather than substitution of a new plaintiff or cause, the amendment related back to the original institution of the suit, so limitation did not bar the claim. The technical dismissal was set aside and the matter was remitted for decision on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127203