<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (4) TMI 32 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127196</link>
    <description>Mere movement of goods from one place of business to another, including dispatch to the assessee&#039;s own shop outside the State, is a business transfer and not a sale for sales tax purposes. Goods sent to persons, customers, or salesmen outside the State in pursuance of existing contracts of sale may, however, be treated as sales within the Act where the statutory fiction creates a sufficient territorial nexus. Explanation II to section 2(g) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was treated as within legislative competence, but its operation remained subject to constitutional limits and the amended form failed for want of the necessary assent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (4) TMI 32 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127196</link>
      <description>Mere movement of goods from one place of business to another, including dispatch to the assessee&#039;s own shop outside the State, is a business transfer and not a sale for sales tax purposes. Goods sent to persons, customers, or salesmen outside the State in pursuance of existing contracts of sale may, however, be treated as sales within the Act where the statutory fiction creates a sufficient territorial nexus. Explanation II to section 2(g) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was treated as within legislative competence, but its operation remained subject to constitutional limits and the amended form failed for want of the necessary assent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>