<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (1) TMI 13 - VINDHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127179</link>
    <description>Money collected as sales tax on export sales and later declared unlawful was treated as a non-gratuitous payment made under statutory compulsion, so the assessee was entitled to refund. The court also held that the special limitation period under the sales tax law did not govern a levy collected without lawful authority; the refund suits were within time under the applicable limitation rule. Because the collection was outside the statute&#039;s lawful ambit, the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction was not excluded by the statutory bar on suits arising under valid assessments or orders. The refund claims therefore succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (1) TMI 13 - VINDHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127179</link>
      <description>Money collected as sales tax on export sales and later declared unlawful was treated as a non-gratuitous payment made under statutory compulsion, so the assessee was entitled to refund. The court also held that the special limitation period under the sales tax law did not govern a levy collected without lawful authority; the refund suits were within time under the applicable limitation rule. Because the collection was outside the statute&#039;s lawful ambit, the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction was not excluded by the statutory bar on suits arising under valid assessments or orders. The refund claims therefore succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>