<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (4) TMI 28 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127176</link>
    <description>Amounts received as damages or recoveries for goods lost in transit could not be included in taxable turnover because there was no transfer of property to the railway or any other party. The levy applied only to sales, and in the absence of a sale no sales tax could arise. The loss of goods gave rise only to an actionable claim, which was outside the definition of goods. Accordingly, the recovery for the lost goods was not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (4) TMI 28 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127176</link>
      <description>Amounts received as damages or recoveries for goods lost in transit could not be included in taxable turnover because there was no transfer of property to the railway or any other party. The levy applied only to sales, and in the absence of a sale no sales tax could arise. The loss of goods gave rise only to an actionable claim, which was outside the definition of goods. Accordingly, the recovery for the lost goods was not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>