<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 26 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127172</link>
    <description>A sales tax default attributable to a partnership firm must be prosecuted against the firm itself, because the liability is treated as the firm&#039;s default. If only some partners are proceeded against in their individual capacity, and all partners constituting the firm are not before the court, the prosecution cannot be treated as one against the firm. In such a situation, conviction of the individual partners is unsustainable. The revisional court may extend relief to an unchallenged co-accused where necessary to keep the result consistent. The convictions and sentences were set aside and the accused were acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 26 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127172</link>
      <description>A sales tax default attributable to a partnership firm must be prosecuted against the firm itself, because the liability is treated as the firm&#039;s default. If only some partners are proceeded against in their individual capacity, and all partners constituting the firm are not before the court, the prosecution cannot be treated as one against the firm. In such a situation, conviction of the individual partners is unsustainable. The revisional court may extend relief to an unchallenged co-accused where necessary to keep the result consistent. The convictions and sentences were set aside and the accused were acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>