<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (10) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127167</link>
    <description>Transfer of property for sales tax purposes depends on the parties&#039; true intention as shown by the contract and course of dealing. Where delivery, inspection, rejection rights and final payment were to occur at Marmagoa, property passed there; naming the seller as consignor in railway receipts did not alter that result. Sales completed outside Madras were therefore not taxable there. A specific procedure and limitation period for escaped-turnover assessment could not be bypassed through general revisional power, which permits review of an existing order but not a fresh inquiry after limitation. The reassessment was without jurisdiction, and the revenue-jurisdiction restriction did not bar recovery of tax collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (10) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127167</link>
      <description>Transfer of property for sales tax purposes depends on the parties&#039; true intention as shown by the contract and course of dealing. Where delivery, inspection, rejection rights and final payment were to occur at Marmagoa, property passed there; naming the seller as consignor in railway receipts did not alter that result. Sales completed outside Madras were therefore not taxable there. A specific procedure and limitation period for escaped-turnover assessment could not be bypassed through general revisional power, which permits review of an existing order but not a fresh inquiry after limitation. The reassessment was without jurisdiction, and the revenue-jurisdiction restriction did not bar recovery of tax collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>